Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 12:01:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 456588E8550601B17FA8EF69239E01FFBEE02E682FC60C3D00F420CE21DE6DFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is, of course, an undisclosed advertisement for a woman's Onlyfans account. Ads such as replying to a post to boost the post to the top of the replies list receive payment for doing this. This goes against Twitter (X)'s terms of service as seen here: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/paid-partnerships

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753356929651429670
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 456588E8550601B17FA8EF69239E01FFBEE02E682FC60C3D00F420CE21DE6DFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1706875313036
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1753356929651429670456588E8550601B17FA8EF69239E01FFBEE02E682FC60C3D00F420CE21DE6DFB