Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 10:32:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EABDFBC48B27C105631F66ADF7EF7626D92C3C47D00E0B43F7570D5D0C1EECB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

El juzgado rechazó paralizar el desahucio porque era propietaria de la mitad de un piso que vendió por 80.000 euros. Contaba con alternativa habitacional desde 2010 y, actualmente, cuenta con un montante económico que le permite mantenerse por sí misma https://www.abc.es/espana/cataluna/juzgado-rechaza-paralizar-desahucio-mujer-anos-barcelona-20231122124558-nt.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753206869311500494
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EABDFBC48B27C105631F66ADF7EF7626D92C3C47D00E0B43F7570D5D0C1EECB0
  • createdAtMillis - 1706869967150
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1753206869311500494EABDFBC48B27C105631F66ADF7EF7626D92C3C47D00E0B43F7570D5D0C1EECB0