Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-03 20:48:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7368AEE215E9A21E89DDB7B8FFF7F9AD4E908D3AEC201DC40DF0D0336A1BECA
Participant Details

Original Note:

El juzgado rechazó paralizar el desahucio porque era propietaria de la mitad de un piso que vendió por 80.000 euros. Contaba con alternativa habitacional desde 2010 y, actualmente, cuenta con un montante económico que le permite mantenerse por sí misma https://www.abc.es/espana/cataluna/juzgado-rechaza-paralizar-desahucio-mujer-anos-barcelona-20231122124558-nt.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753205463708008453
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7368AEE215E9A21E89DDB7B8FFF7F9AD4E908D3AEC201DC40DF0D0336A1BECA
  • createdAtMillis - 1706993283800
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1753205463708008453A7368AEE215E9A21E89DDB7B8FFF7F9AD4E908D3AEC201DC40DF0D0336A1BECA