Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-03 03:14:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D1030C11E9D879EB3019A7AE63F33581F6EFF117CAC7BD43F4C4ADA84CDE66E
Participant Details

Original Note:

El juzgado rechazó paralizar el desahucio porque era propietaria de la mitad de un piso que vendió por 80.000 euros. Contaba con alternativa habitacional desde 2010 y, actualmente, cuenta con un montante económico que le permite mantenerse por sí misma https://www.abc.es/espana/cataluna/juzgado-rechaza-paralizar-desahucio-mujer-anos-barcelona-20231122124558-nt.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753205463708008453
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D1030C11E9D879EB3019A7AE63F33581F6EFF117CAC7BD43F4C4ADA84CDE66E
  • createdAtMillis - 1706930086312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17532054637080084532D1030C11E9D879EB3019A7AE63F33581F6EFF117CAC7BD43F4C4ADA84CDE66E