Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-01 21:33:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1378F83326FCD4332BE9571F3C66781411CF88F416551A12100B45F6FB955B92
Participant Details

Original Note:

&hyphen-minus; El artículo 56 de la Ley de Amparo prevé el voto de calidad. - Nadie dijo que sentó un precedente obligatorio, pero sus efectos serán generales. - El Pleno no había declarado constitucional esa ley. - No hay fast track, por eso les circulan los proyectos antes para estudio. https://x.com/gibran_zazueta/status/1753050145330004471?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753086239320805572
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1378F83326FCD4332BE9571F3C66781411CF88F416551A12100B45F6FB955B92
  • createdAtMillis - 1706823235031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17530862393208055721378F83326FCD4332BE9571F3C66781411CF88F416551A12100B45F6FB955B92