Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 15:46:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D66200DCC127F81CBEA76C01BE3C419026DCC8EE5A0DA2F86A316ED561B1E611
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post states an opinion largely based on the court case in VA, where evidence was presented that showed Heard had abused Depp, not the other way around. Also the proposed CN is factually inaccurate as Depp has never been found guilty of assault or rape in any jurisdiction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752795397016203286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D66200DCC127F81CBEA76C01BE3C419026DCC8EE5A0DA2F86A316ED561B1E611
  • createdAtMillis - 1707061613132
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752795397016203286D66200DCC127F81CBEA76C01BE3C419026DCC8EE5A0DA2F86A316ED561B1E611