Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 10:27:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2BF94660ABF13244FEC0E891C5AC7B45701B2FAA8A21D825641D69FD816715F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post states an opinion largely based on the court case in VA, where evidence was presented that showed Heard had abused Depp, not the other way around. Also the proposed CN is factually inaccurate as Depp has never been found guilty of assault or rape in any jurisdiction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752795397016203286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2BF94660ABF13244FEC0E891C5AC7B45701B2FAA8A21D825641D69FD816715F
  • createdAtMillis - 1707042451141
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752795397016203286C2BF94660ABF13244FEC0E891C5AC7B45701B2FAA8A21D825641D69FD816715F