Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 20:33:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Bezeichnung sei zwar „grundsätzlich als ehrverletzend“ anzusehen – aber eine Strafbarkeit sei „im konkreten Fall im Zuge einer Güter- und Interessenabwägung“ zu verneinen. .... Zumal kein Gericht dabei war. Steht sogar in der Bild. (1) https://www.mopo.de/hamburg/robert-habeck-scheitert-in-hamburg-mit-klage-gegen-poebler/ (2) https://www.bild.de/regional/hamburg/hamburg-regional-politik-und-wirtschaft/staatsanwalt-internet-poebler-darf-robert-habeck-vollidiot-nennen-86971828.bild.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752774724344488411
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B
  • createdAtMillis - 1706733193710
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175277472434448841195AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B