Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 08:28:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B87165B44DE7FD0E75CD3CED62A5D231EB102A2DBEEE4BEA009641000CB0D80C
Participant Details

Original Note:

「「雑誌の出版」「広告掲載」「TVの放映」など相手方の利益のための場合にしか同一性保持権侵害は認められてない」という「追加の背景情報が必要ない理由を説明するノート」がついてますが、実際には画像にURLを追加し無断転載した事例で同一性保持権侵害が認められた事例があるので、事実に則さない説明です。 https://fukuoka-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4498/files/J6302_0523.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752586995883532624
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B87165B44DE7FD0E75CD3CED62A5D231EB102A2DBEEE4BEA009641000CB0D80C
  • createdAtMillis - 1706689701481
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1752586995883532624B87165B44DE7FD0E75CD3CED62A5D231EB102A2DBEEE4BEA009641000CB0D80C