Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 22:14:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4642CAF871BC50EB6ADD2E4627BDC233A0A210021B5B55092F9B7C67DCD70026
Participant Details

Original Note:

「「雑誌の出版」「広告掲載」「TVの放映」など相手方の利益のための場合にしか同一性保持権侵害は認められてない」という「追加の背景情報が必要ない理由を説明するノート」がついてますが、実際には画像にURLを追加し無断転載した事例で同一性保持権侵害が認められた事例があるので、事実に則さない説明です。 https://fukuoka-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4498/files/J6302_0523.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752586995883532624
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4642CAF871BC50EB6ADD2E4627BDC233A0A210021B5B55092F9B7C67DCD70026
  • createdAtMillis - 1706739252721
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17525869958835326244642CAF871BC50EB6ADD2E4627BDC233A0A210021B5B55092F9B7C67DCD70026