Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 18:18:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25A36A769DD1AFEC4EE69A1696909E1000FD93F2CEDDDA1A8BDE999EDED9E61E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study was previously withdrawn because its conclusion was not supported by the methodology. There was no control group and no exclusion criteria https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NL9BK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752498278829088966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25A36A769DD1AFEC4EE69A1696909E1000FD93F2CEDDDA1A8BDE999EDED9E61E
  • createdAtMillis - 1706725125639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175249827882908896625A36A769DD1AFEC4EE69A1696909E1000FD93F2CEDDDA1A8BDE999EDED9E61E