Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 23:39:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7BCBD3CA3FF09B2739239C104265659E0C0AA540A187D5907E2315B2CE9F77F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study was previously withdrawn because its conclusion was not supported by the methodology. There was no control group and no exclusion criteria https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NL9BK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752419564539810102
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7BCBD3CA3FF09B2739239C104265659E0C0AA540A187D5907E2315B2CE9F77F
  • createdAtMillis - 1706657999765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1752419564539810102D7BCBD3CA3FF09B2739239C104265659E0C0AA540A187D5907E2315B2CE9F77F