Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-01 20:38:43 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3A28F5403D9E64412F022A9D8096F4483C9706E8BD3190F7BED70ECB032EE12
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case was not intended to prove racism, nor define it. It was to prove that Laurence Fox was libellous in calling someone a paedophile. That was proven. Fox did not lose his career due to accusations; he lost it due to comments he made on air about a female journalist. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68132377

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752412902659662140
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3A28F5403D9E64412F022A9D8096F4483C9706E8BD3190F7BED70ECB032EE12
  • createdAtMillis - 1706819923714
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1752412902659662140D3A28F5403D9E64412F022A9D8096F4483C9706E8BD3190F7BED70ECB032EE12