Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 21:57:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E98B3588E7D9C5654C6C5B0CAF1F0A307E8BC995FCD6FF609E7E9DEB7618B7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case was not intended to prove racism, nor define it. It was to prove that Laurence Fox was libellous in calling someone a paedophile. That was proven. Fox did not lose his career due to accusations; he lost it due to comments he made on air about a female journalist. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68132377

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752412902659662140
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E98B3588E7D9C5654C6C5B0CAF1F0A307E8BC995FCD6FF609E7E9DEB7618B7B
  • createdAtMillis - 1706651862734
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17524129026596621400E98B3588E7D9C5654C6C5B0CAF1F0A307E8BC995FCD6FF609E7E9DEB7618B7B