Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 20:43:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5CDA5583F5A1C35F417FB014D23138B4DF4034E945CB8E73200694EDF78BA081
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dr. Taylor is not a clinical psychologist and as such is unable to give either a legal nor clinical opinion on court cases. 5 independent psychiatrists assessed Calocane and agreed that he was unable to form rational judgement at the time https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Calocane-sentencing-remarks.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752398774960275952
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5CDA5583F5A1C35F417FB014D23138B4DF4034E945CB8E73200694EDF78BA081
  • createdAtMillis - 1706647415902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17523987749602759525CDA5583F5A1C35F417FB014D23138B4DF4034E945CB8E73200694EDF78BA081