Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 17:51:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43FE369168F36AA45DC1238E0D6A283F8885E857903D710BF8032CB7DBC1B933
Participant Details

Original Note:

Per the inews website, the judge has essentially stated Fox being ‘challenging’ was more likely the cause of the ex-thespians downfall, rather than being called out for said behaviour. https://inews.co.uk/news/laurence-fox-libel-case-explained-2879914?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752387532023619954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43FE369168F36AA45DC1238E0D6A283F8885E857903D710BF8032CB7DBC1B933
  • createdAtMillis - 1706637076901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175238753202361995443FE369168F36AA45DC1238E0D6A283F8885E857903D710BF8032CB7DBC1B933