Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 20:11:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE6466D61764D7D09BDCCEF0605D949D4847CAA9E4025B30AF3A14DCCDCDBB28
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case was not to define racism, but rather to prove that Fox was libellous in calling queer people paedophiles as a slur. The ruling confirmed Fox’s past behaviours have racist connotations , therefore other parties were not damaging to point out he was being racist. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/laurence-fox-loses-libel-case-high-court-b2486600.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752379682916327656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE6466D61764D7D09BDCCEF0605D949D4847CAA9E4025B30AF3A14DCCDCDBB28
  • createdAtMillis - 1706645514589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752379682916327656DE6466D61764D7D09BDCCEF0605D949D4847CAA9E4025B30AF3A14DCCDCDBB28