Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-01-30 18:34:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 85C8D15C88A66755B09CDFE207B4B1765529C0CEE3833D4773746BBA0339D2A1
Participant Details
Original Note:
The case was not to define racism, but rather to prove that Fox was libellous in calling queer people paedophiles as a slur. The ruling confirmed Fox’s past behaviours have racist connotations , therefore other parties were not damaging to point out he was being racist. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/laurence-fox-loses-libel-case-high-court-b2486600.html
All Note Details