Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-01-30 18:46:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4B8DBBC126EA971B9FEACE4ED2D6F304C5CF24743CDA8CDDF8C140FFFC6990E3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The case was not to define racism, but rather to prove that Fox was libellous in calling queer people paedophiles as a slur. The ruling confirmed Fox’s past behaviours have racist connotations , therefore other parties were not damaging to point out he was being racist. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/laurence-fox-loses-libel-case-high-court-b2486600.html
All Note Details