Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 16:50:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Claims that subsequent developments to a prior news source are misinformation, without any contradictory evidence are ... disinformation. NNN for unreasonable skepticism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752268947506753769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1706719820691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175226894750675376922FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6