Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 09:48:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F65708B3B867CFC9341AB6C7AE3143719F10DB9D643BE531428457CDDD2269E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Source in the proposed note barely mentions the sandy hook incident and uses it in the context of debunking “predictive programming”, which is not mentioned in the tweet. The source is also very thin on any persuasive content other than a couple of “expert opinions” from nobodies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752127456255914161
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F65708B3B867CFC9341AB6C7AE3143719F10DB9D643BE531428457CDDD2269E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1706694487766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752127456255914161F65708B3B867CFC9341AB6C7AE3143719F10DB9D643BE531428457CDDD2269E0