Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 12:57:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 882B3CE07DFEE7617BF2FD772A7D3CF731D975C50369B5EC7A0FC7A9D7DAD590
Participant Details

Original Note:

Source in the proposed note barely mentions the sandy hook incident and uses it in the context of debunking “predictive programming”, which is not mentioned in the tweet. The source is also very thin on any persuasive content other than a couple of “expert opinions” from nobodies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752127456255914161
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 882B3CE07DFEE7617BF2FD772A7D3CF731D975C50369B5EC7A0FC7A9D7DAD590
  • createdAtMillis - 1706619449426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752127456255914161882B3CE07DFEE7617BF2FD772A7D3CF731D975C50369B5EC7A0FC7A9D7DAD590