Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 19:46:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C323314C3595F5E8F3DF7966B440416A9932DA6AC09665E5B3836D601E2E5C27
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say that it cannot be defamatory to calling Lawrence fox racist. It instead references the tweets in question. See section 157 and 158 where reference is made to the tweets specifically. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Blake-and-Seymour-v-Fox-Judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752045909158858843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C323314C3595F5E8F3DF7966B440416A9932DA6AC09665E5B3836D601E2E5C27
  • createdAtMillis - 1706557607505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752045909158858843C323314C3595F5E8F3DF7966B440416A9932DA6AC09665E5B3836D601E2E5C27