Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 10:48:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 74602BECAB3C28359F6297EEB719889C506971DA29FAB1C7990044D657073DD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say that it cannot be defamatory to calling Lawrence fox racist. It instead references the tweets in question. See section 157 and 158 where reference is made to the tweets specifically. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Blake-and-Seymour-v-Fox-Judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752045909158858843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 74602BECAB3C28359F6297EEB719889C506971DA29FAB1C7990044D657073DD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1706698096099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175204590915885884374602BECAB3C28359F6297EEB719889C506971DA29FAB1C7990044D657073DD5