Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 13:23:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 738EFB537DC2C04F87471020D73C10EB5D33604722144336121D0BA89F998A02
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say that it cannot be defamatory to calling Lawrence fox racist. It instead references the tweets in question. See section 157 and 158 where reference is made to the tweets specifically. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Blake-and-Seymour-v-Fox-Judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752045909158858843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 738EFB537DC2C04F87471020D73C10EB5D33604722144336121D0BA89F998A02
  • createdAtMillis - 1706621020659
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752045909158858843738EFB537DC2C04F87471020D73C10EB5D33604722144336121D0BA89F998A02