Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 12:24:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EC8C788897DEBFD28D26CE934B383FFFDAE49EE9A98B4F83B7879CA0100AA1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say that it cannot be defamatory to calling Lawrence fox racist. It instead references the tweets in question. See section 157 and 158 where reference is made to the tweets specifically. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Blake-and-Seymour-v-Fox-Judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752045909158858843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EC8C788897DEBFD28D26CE934B383FFFDAE49EE9A98B4F83B7879CA0100AA1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1706617454852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17520459091588588435EC8C788897DEBFD28D26CE934B383FFFDAE49EE9A98B4F83B7879CA0100AA1C