Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-30 12:05:45 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5650F36B5F12CBBFC0953E349CC2990D0E7FBAE5F65514696544031FE50B7585
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judgement does not say that it cannot be defamatory to calling Lawrence fox racist. It instead references the tweets in question. See section 157 and 158 where reference is made to the tweets specifically. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Blake-and-Seymour-v-Fox-Judgment.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752045909158858843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5650F36B5F12CBBFC0953E349CC2990D0E7FBAE5F65514696544031FE50B7585
  • createdAtMillis - 1706616345339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17520459091588588435650F36B5F12CBBFC0953E349CC2990D0E7FBAE5F65514696544031FE50B7585