Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 18:57:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 665F8E12820CEDC9F31DCD2A3CDFD2083DA951ABA2F07337B5622F751A092101
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN on this. The claim by Thorpe was withdrawn after the Court of Appeal said it did not pass the preliminary tests. What Fox states here is his opinion, and I don't think CN should weigh in on this flaming s&^@ show given that it will litigate itself. https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/blake-and-seymour-v-fox/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752032017062015123
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 665F8E12820CEDC9F31DCD2A3CDFD2083DA951ABA2F07337B5622F751A092101
  • createdAtMillis - 1706554645475
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752032017062015123665F8E12820CEDC9F31DCD2A3CDFD2083DA951ABA2F07337B5622F751A092101