Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 18:34:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 295AF28EB6499C2573590745468F6043D9C229035B8A16648384BB414163FE9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN on this. The claim by Thorpe was withdrawn after the Court of Appeal said it did not pass the preliminary tests. What Fox states here is his opinion, and I don't think CN should weigh in on this flaming s&^@ show given that it will litigate itself. https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/blake-and-seymour-v-fox/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752032017062015123
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 295AF28EB6499C2573590745468F6043D9C229035B8A16648384BB414163FE9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1706553253408
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1752032017062015123295AF28EB6499C2573590745468F6043D9C229035B8A16648384BB414163FE9E