Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 09:11:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68906922D1147B158B98E6E1276ED87844FDE68090D5D699C0BC383ECAA96845
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the ICJ has not delivered a final ruling they have made a provisional ruling in which they ruled "at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible." Including " acts of genocide." https://www.icj-cij.org/decisions

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751861005364412596
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68906922D1147B158B98E6E1276ED87844FDE68090D5D699C0BC383ECAA96845
  • createdAtMillis - 1706519461605
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175186100536441259668906922D1147B158B98E6E1276ED87844FDE68090D5D699C0BC383ECAA96845