Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-01-29 02:19:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 14CF43F536125F1E09A264AB9F3C38A55255D2554D0CD95F87FDF88FD45BBFA3
Participant Details
Original Note:
"A meta-analysis is only as good as the studies in it" https://methods.cochrane.org/sites/methods.cochrane.org.statistics/files/uploads/SMGworkshopsEdinburgh/10_intro_meta-analysis.pdf This meta-analysis includes studies with high bias, multiple interventions, retrospective and observational studies. Making this a garbage meta-analysis with high bias and misleading results. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/hydroxychloroquine-treatment-covid-19/art-20555331 https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-hydroxychloroquine https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/12053/ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2809985 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075333222301853X
All Note Details