Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 12:40:01 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA6B7887FB42060E8ED28F844F90A7E9E0E68CE218B966353DD716ABF6A234AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original author of the FT’s data journalism piece has responded, indicating that the discrepancy between the results is due to using two different datasets. https://x.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1751673471795442043?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751679680061853948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA6B7887FB42060E8ED28F844F90A7E9E0E68CE218B966353DD716ABF6A234AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1706532001079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751679680061853948DA6B7887FB42060E8ED28F844F90A7E9E0E68CE218B966353DD716ABF6A234AB