Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-28 21:17:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CED61E23E9C8AB6191BB368790DACDC4E7D4F887025C35577DD9F5FA26A1EF6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original author of the FT’s data journalism piece has responded, indicating that the discrepancy between the results is due to using two different datasets. https://x.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1751673471795442043?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751679680061853948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CED61E23E9C8AB6191BB368790DACDC4E7D4F887025C35577DD9F5FA26A1EF6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1706476626796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751679680061853948CED61E23E9C8AB6191BB368790DACDC4E7D4F887025C35577DD9F5FA26A1EF6D