Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 03:37:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10E6EB8DE1604734A0C7CF5BFE9DC210D38C218F3091B322FCE14887D055D15C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original author of the FT’s data journalism piece has responded, indicating that the discrepancy between the results is due to using two different datasets. https://x.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1751673471795442043?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751679680061853948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10E6EB8DE1604734A0C7CF5BFE9DC210D38C218F3091B322FCE14887D055D15C
  • createdAtMillis - 1706499429212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 175167968006185394810E6EB8DE1604734A0C7CF5BFE9DC210D38C218F3091B322FCE14887D055D15C