Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-28 16:56:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7EB0F4783B77F158A8E3A0FDCA3ECE8F416F13F6FE18645C035388361AF08E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other notes claim that Salaam and the others were "exonerated." They were not. Their cases were vacated. Technically, all of them could be retried, but there is no point. They've already served time. https://centralpark5.com/category/vacate-vs-exonerate

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751630394804392377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7EB0F4783B77F158A8E3A0FDCA3ECE8F416F13F6FE18645C035388361AF08E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1706460963220
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751630394804392377F7EB0F4783B77F158A8E3A0FDCA3ECE8F416F13F6FE18645C035388361AF08E4