Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 11:20:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3111E9ECF99002BF29357DCAE477D530892F017FF34E88C7EA8C8407D8150EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other notes claim that Salaam and the others were "exonerated." They were not. Their cases were vacated. Technically, all of them could be retried, but there is no point. They've already served time. https://centralpark5.com/category/vacate-vs-exonerate

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751630394804392377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3111E9ECF99002BF29357DCAE477D530892F017FF34E88C7EA8C8407D8150EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1706527245566
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751630394804392377F3111E9ECF99002BF29357DCAE477D530892F017FF34E88C7EA8C8407D8150EE