Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-28 23:40:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 940E2EBC73AE2956A75D9E52C6410C18A0838DB2434CAE078DE14E565026415B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other notes claim that Salaam and the others were "exonerated." They were not. Their cases were vacated. Technically, all of them could be retried, but there is no point. They've already served time. https://centralpark5.com/category/vacate-vs-exonerate

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751630394804392377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 940E2EBC73AE2956A75D9E52C6410C18A0838DB2434CAE078DE14E565026415B
  • createdAtMillis - 1706485203338
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751630394804392377940E2EBC73AE2956A75D9E52C6410C18A0838DB2434CAE078DE14E565026415B