Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 01:13:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 870C3847148664CBA80EB5496FD8189C778034C2AA6C50E0EF3868A1DAEA0EC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other notes claim that Salaam and the others were "exonerated." They were not. Their cases were vacated. Technically, all of them could be retried, but there is no point. They've already served time. https://centralpark5.com/category/vacate-vs-exonerate

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751630394804392377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 870C3847148664CBA80EB5496FD8189C778034C2AA6C50E0EF3868A1DAEA0EC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1706490839123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751630394804392377870C3847148664CBA80EB5496FD8189C778034C2AA6C50E0EF3868A1DAEA0EC2