Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-28 22:56:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 015EF949CC561DD1C4D9D280A412D22A8B38286592F6F7EDB1F2996F2613D350
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other notes claim that Salaam and the others were "exonerated." They were not. Their cases were vacated. Technically, all of them could be retried, but there is no point. They've already served time. https://centralpark5.com/category/vacate-vs-exonerate

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751630394804392377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 015EF949CC561DD1C4D9D280A412D22A8B38286592F6F7EDB1F2996F2613D350
  • createdAtMillis - 1706482590978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751630394804392377015EF949CC561DD1C4D9D280A412D22A8B38286592F6F7EDB1F2996F2613D350