Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-28 08:01:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

I link della nota proposta confermano il contenuto del post invece di smentirlo. Non ci sono studi sulla situazione italiana che tengano conto di un serio controllo statistico, è scritto nei risultati dello studio linkato: "no randomised controlled trials were found" https://www.bmj.com/content/330/7487/331.short

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1751514551072223474
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2
createdAtMillis - 1706428865037
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1751514551072223474E22402AB88ED30645E3C27F0BC4A0643B6C5FE66BA0EB4F68DFCE626CBA9D3C2