Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 18:36:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7B59E6F3079370330965E2FE5CCE80AF45F1441CC8A3E4B34E46DBF4C212FE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

I link della nota proposta confermano il contenuto del post invece di smentirlo. Non ci sono studi sulla situazione italiana che tengano conto di un serio controllo statistico, è scritto nei risultati dello studio linkato: "no randomised controlled trials were found" https://www.bmj.com/content/330/7487/331.short

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1751514551072223474
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C7B59E6F3079370330965E2FE5CCE80AF45F1441CC8A3E4B34E46DBF4C212FE8
createdAtMillis - 1706553417119
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1751514551072223474C7B59E6F3079370330965E2FE5CCE80AF45F1441CC8A3E4B34E46DBF4C212FE8