Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-17 11:24:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6CAE6C3F84177F0CB8292111A06D35BE3EA41CE03CDF8346463BC183F5C53865
Participant Details

Original Note:

I link della nota proposta confermano il contenuto del post invece di smentirlo. Non ci sono studi sulla situazione italiana che tengano conto di un serio controllo statistico, è scritto nei risultati dello studio linkato: "no randomised controlled trials were found" https://www.bmj.com/content/330/7487/331.short

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1751514551072223474
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6CAE6C3F84177F0CB8292111A06D35BE3EA41CE03CDF8346463BC183F5C53865
createdAtMillis - 1708169065318
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17515145510722234746CAE6C3F84177F0CB8292111A06D35BE3EA41CE03CDF8346463BC183F5C53865