Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 00:39:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9C8534CBCC2A43C02BD3954A1DFAB5C04C3071BBE26312E34F73F6C8D8D46AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP grossly misrepresents the meaning of ICJ interim ruling that explicitly says that the Court hasn't decided anything about the merits of the case, and the word "plausible" in the ruling only refers to the right of the Palestinians to be protected under Genocide convention. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1751472263403126955
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E9C8534CBCC2A43C02BD3954A1DFAB5C04C3071BBE26312E34F73F6C8D8D46AA
createdAtMillis - 1706488765074
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1751472263403126955E9C8534CBCC2A43C02BD3954A1DFAB5C04C3071BBE26312E34F73F6C8D8D46AA