Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-01 08:38:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63E2BFD65629A8BE71DBFC721B19B231599142023F4C3CEFD7D72DA73E12A5DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il giudice nel video parla di “alcune delle azioni che il Sudafrica SOSTIENE siano state fatte SEMBRANO poter ricadere nell’ambito delle prescrizioni della convenzione ”. Quindi non e’ una pronuncia sul merito o una sentenza, sta solo dicendo che le accuse sono valutabili https://t.co/pE8atKjNqp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751322690621759844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63E2BFD65629A8BE71DBFC721B19B231599142023F4C3CEFD7D72DA73E12A5DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1706776717223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175132269062175984463E2BFD65629A8BE71DBFC721B19B231599142023F4C3CEFD7D72DA73E12A5DD