Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 10:59:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56FC46FD4C80E549B9D7307663217B71CA0295D2C652BA1AF33E66858D94213E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ clarified that no ruling on genocide was made. Par 62: "The Court is not called upon, for the purposes of its decision on the request for the indication of provisional measures, to establish the existence of breaches of obligations under the Genocide Convention." https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751283596315214234
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56FC46FD4C80E549B9D7307663217B71CA0295D2C652BA1AF33E66858D94213E
  • createdAtMillis - 1706525980209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175128359631521423456FC46FD4C80E549B9D7307663217B71CA0295D2C652BA1AF33E66858D94213E