Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-28 12:40:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3ECEE727B3661E6EBB4D8968DF9FFC1A2283D8A0D43B1FBD9A68B99465FC8C9D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ clarified that no ruling on genocide was made. Par 62: "The Court is not called upon, for the purposes of its decision on the request for the indication of provisional measures, to establish the existence of breaches of obligations under the Genocide Convention." https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751283596315214234
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3ECEE727B3661E6EBB4D8968DF9FFC1A2283D8A0D43B1FBD9A68B99465FC8C9D
  • createdAtMillis - 1706445634754
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17512835963152142343ECEE727B3661E6EBB4D8968DF9FFC1A2283D8A0D43B1FBD9A68B99465FC8C9D