Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-28 00:49:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81C5CA4F401093D2F9D0C719B00A061984D19C4499F81AF7ECD9419BF512D791
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cureusという雑誌は査読はしますがインパクトファクターが1.2で極めて低く査読期間が極めて短く、略奪的または信頼できないとみなされる機関出版物のトップ2に入っており、多くの批判を集めている事に注意が必要です。 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cureus

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751222122100461741
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81C5CA4F401093D2F9D0C719B00A061984D19C4499F81AF7ECD9419BF512D791
  • createdAtMillis - 1706402996492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175122212210046174181C5CA4F401093D2F9D0C719B00A061984D19C4499F81AF7ECD9419BF512D791