Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 13:36:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F74F87A5F16A9653B347040B90F42A631602544B78A35D941EE290CFE2C31BB8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il est dommage que le Figaro rapporte sans questionner comme devrait l'ĂȘtre le travail journalistique . L. Fabius se prend-il pour une institution? Car la remise en cause le concerne lui ou les membres du conseil, pas l'institution. https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/les-membres

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751215092148941287
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F74F87A5F16A9653B347040B90F42A631602544B78A35D941EE290CFE2C31BB8
  • createdAtMillis - 1706362611033
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751215092148941287F74F87A5F16A9653B347040B90F42A631602544B78A35D941EE290CFE2C31BB8