Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-01-27 11:31:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 75D612C7FBE85C1D2E266FF8C4D49A5C65E1D343AFE92223532E721BBB810C39
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court concluded: “the facts and circumstances mentioned above are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible.” This is not the same as the claim the post is making. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/experts-react/experts-react-what-the-international-court-of-justice-said-and-didnt-say-in-the-genocide-case-against-israel/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68108260.amp
All Note Details