Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 22:09:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C96B4113AC47F4AC1BED1ABA938F456490D1C4DE264182709DFBECC3A5614480
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note NOT needed. Community Notes are not for trying to promote personally held opinions and subjective interpretations of legal judgments. In this case, the ICJ judgment is obviously open to interpretation from all sides.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750989702654501224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C96B4113AC47F4AC1BED1ABA938F456490D1C4DE264182709DFBECC3A5614480
  • createdAtMillis - 1706306962858
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750989702654501224C96B4113AC47F4AC1BED1ABA938F456490D1C4DE264182709DFBECC3A5614480